Ohio State is in the process of revising websites and program materials to accurately reflect compliance with the law. While this work occurs, language referencing protected class status or other activities prohibited by Ohio Senate Bill 1 may still appear in some places. However, all programs and activities are being administered in compliance with federal and state law.

Frank Keller

Computational tree.
Fri, January 11, 2013
All Day
Jennings 60

Prediction in Language Processing


There is strong evidence that human sentence processing is incremental, i.e., that structures are built word by word. Recent experimental results show that the processor us also predictive, i.e., it can anticipate upcoming linguistic material on the basis of previous input. However, the granularity of this prediction process is currently unclear. We present evidence from two visual world experiments that show that speakers can make fine-grained predictions based on the frame and the frequency of a verb. We use this data to motivate a computational model of human parsing that includes an explicit mechanism for generating and verifying predictions. Based on this mechanism, our model can capture both locality effects and surprisal effects, and thus unify a body of empirical results that have so far been accounted separately.